MODULE 3 · PART 3.7 · PRINTABLE PDF

Audit documentation

Printable study notes, diagrams and practice support for Part 3.7.

Audit documentation, page 1 of 6Audit documentation, page 2 of 6Audit documentation, page 3 of 6Audit documentation, page 4 of 6Audit documentation, page 5 of 6Audit documentation, page 6 of 6
Read the handout text

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Audit documentation

MODULE 3 | 3.7 | STUDENT COMPANION

Audit documentation is the lasting proof that the work was done and the judgements were sound. A good

working paper lets an experienced auditor with no connection to the engagement see what was done, why,

and what it showed. Files separate permanent from current information; the final file is assembled within

about 60 days of the auditor's report and kept for seven years under the Corporations Act; after assembly

nothing is deleted, and any change is fully explained. Client data is protected throughout.

What documentation does

Shows the basis for the auditor's report, and that the audit was planned and performed in line with the

standards and the law

Lets the team plan, supervise and review the work, and holds people accountable for it

Carries knowledge forward to next year's audit

Allows quality reviews, firm inspections and regulators' inspections: the file is the only lasting record of

what was done

A working paper from Voltana's file

Voltana Energy Ltd Year ended 30 June 2026 Revenue: cut-off test R4

Objective To test whether revenue around 30 June was recorded in the right period

Population and source All sales recorded from 16 June to 14 July 2026, extracted from the new system and reconciled to the general ledger

Selection Every sale above $50,000, plus 40 others chosen at random

Items tested Listed by contract number on schedule R4.1, so a reviewer can find the same items

Procedure Matched each sale to its signed installation completion form and checked the installation date

Results 12 sales, about $1.2 million in total, had no installation by 30 June; all 12 came from the June manual journals

Cross-reference Exceptions taken to the schedule of misstatements, item 1

Conclusion Revenue at 30 June is overstated by about $1.2 million. The June manual journals are a significant matter for

the engagement partner

Prepared by: KL, 21 July 2026 Reviewed by: MD (manager), 28 July 2026

The test of a good working paper: could an experienced auditor, new to this audit, pick it up and understand

exactly what was done, why, and what it showed? R4 passes because it states the objective, the population and

its source, how items were chosen, how to find them again, the procedure, the results, where the exceptions

went, the conclusion, and who prepared and reviewed it, and when.

ADVANCED AUDIT AND ASSURANCE | M3 | 3.7 | STUDENT COMPANION

1

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Beyond the tests

Significant matters, such as the June revenue journals, are documented with the discussions held about them:

what was discussed, with whom and when, and how each was resolved. If the auditor found information that was

inconsistent with its final conclusion, the file shows how that was dealt with. And if, in exceptional

circumstances, the auditor departed from a requirement of the standards, the file explains why, and how the

alternative procedures achieved the requirement's aim.

Permanent file and current file

Permanent file

Information of continuing importance

Current file

This year's work

The constitution

Major contracts and leases

Organisation charts

Notes on the accounting systems and controls

Key accounting policies

Planning documents and the risk assessment

Lead schedules summarising each area

The detailed working papers behind each lead schedule

Completion documents

R Revenue lead schedule

R1 R2 R3 R4 Cut-off

Audit software keeps the same logic: an index, cross-references, and tick marks that show which procedure was done on each figure

Agreed to the supporting document ^ Addition checked TB Agreed to the trial balance

Examples only: each firm sets its own symbols

Keep the permanent file current. It is reviewed and updated every year: a new lease or loan agreement goes

in, and anything no longer in force comes out. This year's testing of those documents, such as checking loan

covenants at year end, belongs in the current file.

After the auditor's report is signed

Stage The rule

Assembly Assemble the final file promptly, normally within 60 days of the auditor's report date.

Assembly is administrative: deleting superseded drafts, sorting and cross-referencing,

signing off completion checklists. It is not a chance to do new audit work

Retention Nothing is deleted or discarded before the retention period ends: seven years for audits

under the Corporations Act

Changes after

assembly

If documentation must be modified or added, record the specific reasons, and when and by

whom the changes were made and reviewed

ADVANCED AUDIT AND ASSURANCE | M3 | 3.7 | STUDENT COMPANION

2

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Case note: KPMG and the leaked inspection lists

In the United States, several people at KPMG's American firm obtained confidential lists, leaked by people who

had worked at or for the audit regulator, showing which of the firm's audits the regulator planned to inspect. The

firm's staff then reviewed and revised working papers on some of those audits, after the audit reports had

already been issued, to improve how the files would look to the inspectors. Criminal charges followed in 2018

against six people, including former KPMG partners and former regulator staff. All six were convicted, four by

pleading guilty and two at trial, but by 2024 every conviction had been set aside, after an appeal court ruled in

another case that a regulator's confidential information isn't property under the federal fraud laws. Separately, in

2019 the firm admitted the facts and agreed to pay US$50 million to settle charges with the Securities and

Exchange Commission; the settlement also covered cheating on internal training exams.

Why it matters: inspection only works if files show what was really done, and when. Altering past work to

mislead an inspector attacks the integrity of the whole system.

Source: US SEC press releases 2018-6 (January 2018) and 2019-95 (June 2019); US court orders vacating the convictions (2024).

Protecting client data

What the file holds

Payroll details, customer information, contracts and strategy

Why it must be protected

The Code's principle of confidentiality, privacy laws and the firm's

own policies

1

Collect

Keep only the data the

audit needs

2

Store

Control who can open

each file; encrypt data

on laptops

3

Share

Secure client portals,

not email, for sensitive

files; encrypt data in

transfer

4

Keep

Retain it for the

required period, and

no longer

5

Destroy

Securely, when the

retention period ends

The aim: client data is seen only by people who need it, for as long as it is needed, and travels only by secure routes

ADVANCED AUDIT AND ASSURANCE | M3 | 3.7 | STUDENT COMPANION

3

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Practice questions

MODULE 3 | 3.7 | TRY THESE BEFORE THE WORKED ANSWERS

Question 1 - What's missing from this working paper?

This working paper comes from the audit of Marralong Seafoods Pty Ltd (imagined), a seafood processor with a

30 June year end. Identify everything that is missing or inadequate, and explain why each gap matters.

MARRALONG SEAFOODS PTY LTD P6 Search for unrecorded liabilities

Work done: Reviewed payments made after year end and picked 25. Checked the invoices. Two invoices,

for prawns delivered in June, were not in trade payables. Adjusted.

Conclusion: OK.

Prepared: TM

ADVANCED AUDIT AND ASSURANCE | M3 | 3.7 | STUDENT COMPANION

4

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Question 2 - Permanent or current?

Sort these ten documents from Marralong's audit into the permanent file or the current file, and give a reason for

each.

Document File Why

(a) Marralong's constitution

(b) Bank confirmation of balances at 30 June 2026

(c) The ten-year lease of the processing plant

(d) The organisation chart

(e) Notes from the year-end count of frozen stock

(f) The five-year loan agreement with the bank

(g) This year's audit plan and risk assessment

(h) The lead schedule for trade payables

(i) Notes on the payroll system and its controls

(j) This year's signed representation letter

Question 3 - After assembly: may or may not?

The final file for Marralong's audit has been assembled. For each scenario, say what the auditor may and may

not do. (a) Three months later, the engagement manager notices that a working paper on inventory has no

reviewer's sign-off, although she remembers reviewing it. She wants to sign it now, dated with the original review

date. (b) Before an ASIC inspection, a senior wants to delete a draft memo containing a calculation error and

replace a brief conclusion with a fuller one. (c) After the report is issued, the auditor learns of a fact that existed

at the report date, performs new procedures and reaches new conclusions.

ADVANCED AUDIT AND ASSURANCE | M3 | 3.7 | STUDENT COMPANION

5

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Worked answers

MODULE 3 | 3.7 | WORKED ANSWERS - ATTEMPT THE QUESTIONS FIRST

Question 1 - Gaps in working paper P6

Missing or inadequate Why it matters

The period and the date of the

work

A reviewer can't tell which year it covers or when it was done

An objective Nobody can judge whether it answered the right question: are payables complete?

The population and its source Which payments, over what period, from which report, checked to the bank?

How the 25 were chosen Above an amount, or at random? The extent of testing can't be judged

Identification of items No references, suppliers or amounts, so the items can't be found again

The procedure 'Checked the invoices' for what? The test is whether goods arrived by 30 June

The results No amounts; 'adjusted' doesn't say by whom, or whether management agreed

Cross-reference The two misstatements belong on the schedule of misstatements

A real conclusion 'OK' ignores the errors; two exceptions may call for more testing first

Sign-offs No preparer's date, no reviewer and no review date

Question 2 - Permanent or current

Document File Why

(a) Constitution Permanent Of continuing importance; check for changes each year

(b) Bank confirmation Current Evidence for this year's balances

(c) Ten-year plant lease Permanent A long-term contract; this year's testing goes in the current file

(d) Organisation chart Permanent Updated when the structure changes

(e) Stocktake notes Current This year's procedure

(f) Loan agreement Permanent Its terms run for five years; covenant testing at 30 June is current

(g) Audit plan and risk assessment Current Planning for this year

(h) Payables lead schedule Current Summarises this year's figures

(i) Payroll system notes Permanent Continuing, but reviewed and updated each year

(j) Representation letter Current A completion document for this year

Question 3 - After assembly

(a) May add, may not backdate. She may add the sign-off as new documentation, recording the reason,

today's date and who made and reviewed it. The original date would misstate when the work was done.

(b) May not. Nothing may be deleted before the retention period ends, and reworking a conclusion for

inspectors is the very conduct at the heart of the KPMG case. Any needed explanation is a new, dated note.

(c) May, and must document it: the circumstances, the new procedures, the evidence, the conclusions and

their effect on the auditor's report, and when and by whom the changes were made and reviewed.

ADVANCED AUDIT AND ASSURANCE | M3 | 3.7 | WORKED ANSWERS

6

← Back to the file vault