MODULE 3 · PART 3.3.2 · PRINTABLE PDF

Competitive advantage and generic strategies

Printable study notes to use alongside Part 3.3.2.

Competitive advantage and generic strategies, page 1 of 6Competitive advantage and generic strategies, page 2 of 6Competitive advantage and generic strategies, page 3 of 6Competitive advantage and generic strategies, page 4 of 6Competitive advantage and generic strategies, page 5 of 6Competitive advantage and generic strategies, page 6 of 6
Read the handout text

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Competitive advantage and generic

strategies

MODULE 3 | 3.3.2 | STUDENT COMPANION

Porter (1980): competitive advantage comes from lower cost or differentiation, pursued across the

whole industry or in a focused segment. Trying to do everything leaves an organisation stuck in the

middle. A few firms combine low cost and differentiation through superior technology or processes, but

most need a clear choice.

Porter's generic strategies

SOURCE OF ADVANTAGE

Lower cost Differentiation

Broad scope

The whole industry

Narrow scope

One segment

Cost leadership

Lowest costs in the industry

Differentiation

Distinctive offer customers pay more for

Cost focus

Lowest cost within a niche

Differentiation focus

Distinctive offer for a niche

Stuck in the middle?

No clear advantage

Decide how to compete: an organisation can't be all things to all people

Nine ways to differentiate

Quality

Performance, durability, image

Reliability

Guarantees customers can count on

Innovation

A new way of presenting the product

Range

Everything in one place

Service levels

Round-the-clock help, or fast self-service

Features

Useful extras

Brand name

Built through decades of consistency

Distribution

Exclusive channels

Flexibility

Customised to order

It only pays if customers will pay more for the difference than it costs to create

GLOBAL STRATEGY AND LEADERSHIP | M3 | 3.3.2 | STUDENT COMPANION

1

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Worked examples (imagined)

Situation Working Result

Differentiation premium: dishwasher costs $120

more to make, sells for $300 more

$300 - $120 +$180 a unit: worth it

Same dishwasher if customers pay only $100 more $100 - $120 -$20 a unit: not worth it

Price war: price $50, costs $38 (low-cost firm) and

$44 (rival)

50 - 38; 50 - 44 $12 and $6 a unit

After the price falls to $45 45 - 38; 45 - 44 $7 and $1 a unit

Case note: Aesop, differentiation

Aesop, founded in Melbourne in 1987, built its brand on plant-based formulations, plain amber bottles with

simple labels, and stores each designed differently to suit their neighbourhood. It relied far less on conventional

advertising than most rivals. In 2023 L'Oreal bought Aesop for about US$2.5 billion. Every element supports the

same distinctive position.

Sources: L'Oreal releases, 3 April and 30 August 2023; Natura &Co release, 30 August 2023.

Ten sources of low cost

Scale and scope

Spread fixed costs

Experience

Learning lowers costs

Technology

Automation and better

processes

No frills

Strip out what

customers won't pay for

Simple design

Fewer parts and

materials

Cost control

Materials, labour,

overheads

Location

Cheap premises; near

transport

Production

innovation

Cheaper ways to make

it

Cheap assets

Second-hand or

liquidation buys

Subsidies

Government incentives

The reward: higher margins at similar prices, or more market share at lower prices

Case note: Primark, cost leadership

Primark, owned by Associated British Foods, sells clothing at very low prices. It keeps them low through huge

volumes, thin margins on each item, large stores in busy locations and, traditionally, little conventional

advertising. For decades it sold only in its stores, because delivering low-priced clothes to individual homes

would have eaten the margin; it now offers click and collect across Great Britain and has announced plans for

home delivery. In the year to September 2025 its sales were about £9.5 billion from 473 stores in 17 markets.

Sources: Associated British Foods results, 4 November 2025, and trading statement, 10 September 2026.

GLOBAL STRATEGY AND LEADERSHIP | M3 | 3.3.2 | STUDENT COMPANION

2

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Four types of focus (imagined examples)

Type Example

Narrow product line A workshop that only restores vintage motorcycles

Customer segment A gym designed for people over sixty

Geographic segment A bakery serving one suburb

Focused functional capability A laboratory specialising in rare soil contaminants

Innovation as a basis for differentiation needs the right resources and capabilities (internal, acquired or

through alliances), flat structures, loose controls, flexible planning, rewards such as autonomy and recognition,

and creative, technically strong people. Protect innovations through secrecy, patents or lead time.

GLOBAL STRATEGY AND LEADERSHIP | M3 | 3.3.2 | STUDENT COMPANION

3

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Practice questions

MODULE 3 | 3.3.2 | TRY THESE BEFORE THE WORKED ANSWERS

Question 1 - Which generic strategy?

Imagined business Generic strategy and why

(a) A national discount pharmacy chain that buys in huge

volumes and keeps stores basic

(b) A premium electric bicycle brand known for design and

after-sales service, sold nationwide

(c) A cafe serving only the staff and visitors of one large

hospital

(d) A 24-hour gym chain with minimal staff and no classes,

in every capital city

(e) A vegan dog food maker selling online to a small group

of devoted owners

Question 2 - Low-cost measures for a budget hotel

Imagine Stayright Hotels, a new budget hotel chain planning 30 hotels near Australian airports. Suggest one

practical measure for each basis.

Basis of low cost Practical measure for Stayright Hotels

Economies of scale

No-frills product

Technology

Location

Simple design

Cost control

GLOBAL STRATEGY AND LEADERSHIP | M3 | 3.3.2 | STUDENT COMPANION

4

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Question 3 - Stuck in the middle

Imagine Hearthwood Furniture, a mid-priced chain of 25 stores. Discount retailers undercut its prices, boutique

designers outclass its style, and its sales and margins have fallen for three years. Explain why it may be stuck in

the middle, and recommend a way out.

GLOBAL STRATEGY AND LEADERSHIP | M3 | 3.3.2 | STUDENT COMPANION

5

Accounting Ahead | Original study resource | accountingahead.com.au

Worked answers

MODULE 3 | 3.3.2 | WORKED ANSWERS - ATTEMPT THE QUESTIONS FIRST

Question 1 - Generic strategies

Business Answer

(a) Discount pharmacy Cost leadership: scale buying power, basic stores, broad market

(b) Premium e-bikes Differentiation: design and service across the broad market

(c) Hospital cafe Focus (geographic and customer segment): one site's staff and visitors

(d) 24-hour gyms Cost leadership: no frills, minimal staff, national scale

(e) Vegan dog food Differentiation focus: a distinctive product for a small, committed segment

Question 2 - Stayright Hotels

Basis Possible measure

Economies of scale Standard designs and central buying of beds, linen and fittings for all 30 hotels

No-frills product No restaurant or room service; vending and partnerships with nearby food outlets

Technology Self check-in kiosks and digital keys, reducing front-desk staff

Location Cheaper land near airports rather than city centres

Simple design Compact, identical rooms that are quick to clean

Cost control Energy-efficient systems; housekeeping only on request for longer stays

Question 3 - Hearthwood Furniture

Diagnosis: Hearthwood is neither the cheapest nor the most distinctive, so customers have no clear reason to

choose it. Falling sales and margins over three years are the classic symptom.

A way out: choose a basis to compete. One option is differentiation focus: target a specific segment, such as

apartment dwellers, with compact, well-designed, customisable furniture and strong service, and close stores

that don't fit. A low-cost route is likely unrealistic against the discounters' scale. Whatever the choice, every

element (range, price, stores, marketing) must support it.

GLOBAL STRATEGY AND LEADERSHIP | M3 | 3.3.2 | WORKED ANSWERS

6

← Back to the file vault